Islamic Invasion Of India: The Greatest Genocide In History

One can contest the numbers here but cant deny the bloddy history of Islamic Invasion of subcontinent.

The Muslim Issue

Muslim historian Firishta [full name Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah, born in 1560 and died in 1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim, was the first to give an idea to the medieval bloodbath that was India during Muslim rule, when he declared that over 400 million Hindus got slaughtered during Muslim invasion and occupation of India. Survivors got enslaved and castrated. India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500’s the Hindu population was 200 million.

By the time the British arrived to the shores of India and after centuries of Islamic law ruling India, the Hindu population was not behaving like their normal self; they were behaving like Muslims. There are many witness reports from the British archives of horrendous Hindu incidents that were shocking in cruelty to the British – and they therefore sometimes…

View original post 3,624 more words

Advertisements

Perpetual war? 

The case of kulbhushan jadhav should make one thing clear that Pakistan is in no mood to let go of it pursuit for strategic equivalence with India not withstanding the differences in geography, economy & the goodwill India has garnered over last seven decades. It would be foolhardy on part of pacifists now to believe that talks & dialogue with pakistan would bring normalisation in relations between estranged brothers. This episode also reaffirms that civil government in Pakistan is not in control over its strategy for foreign relations & defense. Army establishment regards any normalisation in relations as a threat to its primacy in Pakistani society.

China has a vested interest in keeping India in regional quagmires as seeks to regain the leadership in 21st century. It has never let go of any opportunity to signal to us that we are not noteworthy of the global space that it so willingly wants for itself. Its blocking of Security Council resolution to declare JeM as a terrorist organization is one such attempt. It has been very careful in cultivating a relationship that serves both sides. 

If India finds itself in such a state where it feels threatened by two of its neighbors, the blame must squarely be laid at the door of the type of polity practiced & scant attention paid for economic development in real sense rather than fantasy ridden socialist framework. The democracy as practiced in India has done a great deal of harm to nation, in the name of democracy,  farcical secularism has been practiced where the contempt & criticism are reserved for majority communalism or which could be called reaction to perceived or real alienation & feeling of being cheated,while we either unknowingly ignore the minority fundamentalism & extremism or are really afraid of the reaction from learned elites around us. In order to preserve secularism what has replaced the our much prized democracy is a kind of third grade democracy filled with avarice & corruption prone politicians, religious leaders & academicians. 

China has done which is unparalleled in human history ie. lifting around 600 million people out of poverty. We cannot even do that in coming two decades even by lowering the threshold of poverty definition. The capital in the hands of Chinese allows them to alter narratives around the world, where as we have to rely on our culture & shared values with west even to ask them to strike a balance in their approach vis a vis India. China has employed its brute efficiency in giving effect to its projects like OBOR & maritime trade routes. This has in turn emboldened the hipe of Pakistan to take on India although not conventionally but by employing clandestine elements to needle India on a daily basis. Otherwise which sane nstion would all its soldiers to be martyred on international border on a daily basis. One day its shelling, the next day its decapitation. There is no greatness in bowing & being humbled by an adversary much smaller & weaker than you. Its a weakness that has afflicted India atleast from Gandhi-Nehru era. Had the issue of Pakistan Kashmir been handled on a different note and through the ruled of real politk rather than idealism of gandhi, perhaps the equations would have been less complicated.

Normalisation of deviance? 

Sanjay Hegde who is known for his left leaning views says that cow vigilantism is a result of normalisation of the deviance. The argument he makes is that Ambedkar had accepted the amendments to constitution as result of compromise to pacify hindu nationalists. But the same argument can be made about the leeway granted to muslims in the name of secularism to continue with practices which belong to the 7th century tribal land rather than 21st century India. 

One can’t blame sanjay, for it is expected of pseudo seculars, who claim to be the sole repository of modernity, secularism, wisdom & knowledge, to be not able to make convincing arguments and without a preconcieved notion of agenda they want to further. Similar arguments can be made about the spectacular blunder on part of much revered Nehru chachaji, his political immaturity over issues such Kashmir and tibet are costing India till this day. Had we forced the maharaja hari singh to accede to Indian Union rather than waiting for pakistani tribesmen to launch an attack, the situation would have been certainly different. The compromise made in the form of A370 was perhaps one such case of normalisation of deviance.  One thing that must be clear to Sanjay and his ilk is that there is no possibility of going back on A370 without a bloodbath, in an already volatile Valley of Kashmir. And the arguments forwarded by such doves on every occasion or perhaps terrorist attack launched from pakistani side is that India must continue talks and offer some consolation to the suffering kashmiri people and seperatists. Isn’t that another case of normalisation of the deviance?. 

Another classic case of hypocrisy is the normalisation of the islamisation the world over, west to be specific. When so called femenists come out in support of burqa,  you know how deviance is creeping the world over. These are probably not the best of times for left & liberals. One can look at the rot prevailing in their thinking and acts for the reasons. One must start from the unconvincing and biased arguments of Sanjay and his brigade.